President Trump’s 101-Year Deportation Plan

by Jason Dzubow on July 27, 2017

Joseph Stalin and Mao Zedong had their five-year plans. Nikita Khrushchev had his seven-year plan. And now President Trump has a 101-year plan. That’s how long it will take to deport the country’s 11 million undocumented residents if current trends continue.

Happy Birthday! Now, get the hell out of my country!

The most recent statistics on case completions in Immigration Court show that the Trump Administration has issued an average of 8,996 removal (deportation) orders per month between February and June 2017 (and 11,000,000 divided by 8,996 cases/month = 1,222.8 months, or 101.9 years). That’s up from 6,913 during the same period last year, but still well-below the peak period during the early days of the Obama Administration, when courts were issuing 13,500 removal orders each month.

Of course, the Trump Administration has indicated that it wants to ramp up deportations, and to that end, the Executive Office for Immigration Review or EOIR–the office that oversees the nation’s Immigration Courts–plans to hire more Immigration Judges (“IJs”). Indeed, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, the Attorney General (at least for now) announced that EOIR would hire 50 more judges this year and 75 next year.

Assuming EOIR can find 125 new IJs, and also assuming that no currently-serving judges retire (a big assumption given that something like 50% of our country’s IJs are eligible to retire), then EOIR will go from 250 IJs to 375. So instead of 101 years to deport the nation’s 11 million undocumented residents, it will only take 68 years (assuming that no new people enter the U.S. illegally or overstay their visas, and assuming my math is correct–more big assumptions).

But frankly, I’m doubtful that 68 years–or even 101 years–is realistic. It’s partly that more people are entering the population of “illegals” all the time, and so even as the government chips away at the 11,000,000 figure, more people are joining that club, so to speak. Worse, from the federal government’s point of view, there is not enough of a national consensus to deport so many people, and there is significant legal resistance to Mr. Trump’s immigration agenda.

In addition to all this, there is the Trump Administration’s modus operandi, which is best characterized as malevolence tempered by incompetence. One statistic buried in the recent deportation numbers illustrates this point. In March 2017, judges issued 10,110 removal orders. A few months later, in June, judges issued 8,919 removal orders.

This means that the number of deportation orders dropped by 1,191 or about 11.8%. How can this be? In a word: Incompetence (I suppose if I wanted to be more generous—which I don’t—I could say, Inexperience). The Trump Administration has no idea how to run the government and their failure in the immigration realm is but one example.

There are at least a couple ways the Administration’s incompetence has manifested itself at EOIR.

One is in the distribution of judges. It makes sense to send IJs where they are needed. But that’s not exactly what is happening. Maybe it’s just opening night jitters for the new leadership at EOIR. Maybe they’ll find their feet and get organized. But so far, it seems EOIR is sending judges to the border, where they are underutilized. While this may have the appearance of action (which may be good enough for this Administration), the effect—as revealed in the statistical data—is that fewer people are actually being deported.

As I wrote previously, the new Acting Director of EOIR has essentially no management experience, and it’s still unclear whether he is receiving the support he needs, or whether his leadership team has the institutional memory to navigate the EOIR bureaucracy. Perhaps this is part of the reason for the inefficient use of judicial resources.

Another reason may be that shifting judges around is not as easy as moving pieces on a chess board. The IJs have families, homes, and ties to their communities. Not to mention a union to protect them (or try to protect them) from management. And it doesn’t help that many Immigration Courts are located in places that you wouldn’t really want to live, if you had a choice. So getting judges to where you need them, and keeping them there for long enough to make a difference, is not so easy.

A second way the Trump Administration has sabotaged itself is related to prosecutorial discretion or PD. In the pre-Trump era, DHS attorneys (the “prosecutors” in Immigration Court) had discretion to administratively close cases that were not a priority. This allowed DHS to focus on people who they wanted to deport: Criminals, human rights abusers, people perceived as a threat to national security. In other words, “Bad Hombres.” Now, PD is essentially gone. By the end of the Obama Administration, 2,400 cases per month were being closed through PD. Since President Trump came to office, the average is less than 100 PD cases per month. The result was predictable: DHS can’t prioritize cases and IJs are having a harder time managing their dockets. In essence, if everyone is a deportation priority, no one is a deportation priority.

Perhaps the Trump Administration hopes to “fix” these problems by making it easier to deport people. The Administration has floated the idea of reducing due process protections for non-citizens. Specifically, they are considering expanding the use of expedited removal, which is a way to bypass Immigration Courts for certain aliens who have been in the U.S. for less than 90 days. But most of the 11 million undocumented immigrants have been here much longer than that, and so they would not be affected. Also, expansion of expedited removal would presumably trigger legal challenges, which may make it difficult to implement.

Another “fix” is to prevent people from coming here in the first place. Build the wall. Deny visas to people overseas. Scare potential immigrants so they stay away. Illegally turn away asylum seekers at the border. Certainly, all this will reduce the number of people coming to America. But the cost will be high. Foreign tourists, students, and business people add many billions to our economy. Foreign scholars, scientists, artists, and other immigrants contribute to our country’s strength. Whether the U.S. is willing to forfeit the benefits of the global economy in order to restrict some people from coming or staying here unlawfully, I do not know. But the forces driving migration are powerful, and so I have real doubts that Mr. Trump’s efforts will have more than a marginal impact, especially over the long run. And even if he could stop the flow entirely, it still leaves 11 million people who are already here.

There is an obvious alternative to Mr. Trump’s plan. Instead of wasting billions of dollars, harming our economy, and ripping millions of families apart, why not move towards a broad legalization for those who are here? Focus on deporting criminals and other “bad hombres,” and leave hard-working immigrants in peace. Sadly, this is not the path we are on. And so, sometime in 2118, perhaps our country will finally say adieu to its last undocumented resident.

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

Xtradonaire September 4, 2017 at 9:50 pm

Republicans are as guilty as Trump. For a better and clearer understanding read my new blog “BORN AGAIN” https://xtradonaire.wordpress.com/2017/08/30/born-again/ as well as my other blogs at xtradonaire.wordpress.com

Reply

Itunu September 2, 2017 at 12:24 am

Dear jason,you’ve really been helpful,thanks so much.I’m still expecting my ead card and I am planning to move to another state but i’m scared of moving now so I dont lose the card in case it arrive and I already moved,my question now is if I change my address;will the card arrive at the new address or will there be any problem if I change my address? Thanks

Reply

Jason Dzubow September 3, 2017 at 7:03 am

You can change your address using the form AR-11, available at http://www.uscis.gov. You can do this on-line, and you have to do it for the asylum case and the I-765. If you do, it should be alright. EADs are taking 3, 4 or more months, and so if you think you are close to receiving it, maybe you are better off waiting to move, but if you only filed a month ago, for example, you should be able to move, change your address, and get the EAD card without a problem. Take care, Jason

Reply

Itunu September 4, 2017 at 1:08 pm

Thanks so much

Reply

Itunu September 4, 2017 at 9:10 pm

Dear Jason,can I fill the AR-11 online or do I need to print out the form and send to immigration office?pls I will appreciate your prompt response.thanks

Reply

Jason Dzubow September 5, 2017 at 6:36 am

You can fill it on-line. I highly recommend you print the receipt and keep a copy to prove that you submitted the form, in case that is ever necessary. Take care, Jason

Hope August 19, 2017 at 3:21 pm

Hi Jason
I like this forum. It gives me trust .I fled my country two years ago. Hopefully my interview is not far. I was persecuted, and now they went after my younger sister whom I was living with .she is even a teenager, she is 16years old. I am the one financially supporting her up today. In fact ,she is 100% depending on me to be able to survive . Is it possible to fill a petition for her if I get asylum approval exactly same way I can do it for my kid or wife. Since she is my sister can I make her as dependant? What paper are required according to US immigration law.
Thanks

Reply

Jason Dzubow August 21, 2017 at 6:14 am

Unfortunately, you cannot file for a sibling. Maybe this would be possible if you could somehow legally adopt her, but I do not know about that. A better bet for her would be to get a visa to come here on her own – maybe as a student, but I know that it is never easy to get a visa. Good luck, Jason

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: